Idea 1
2,000 Years of Strange and Earnest Sex Advice
Have you ever wondered how people centuries ago figured out what to do in bed—or worse, how they were taught to do it? In Put What Where?, journalist John Naish peeks under the covers of 2,000 years of sexual instruction, superstition, and sheer madness to show that human beings have spent as much time misunderstanding sex as they have enjoying it. The book isn’t just a funny history lesson; it’s a cultural safari through how religion, pseudoscience, power, and prurience shaped the way societies tried to control desire.
Naish argues that while sex is fundamental to human life, it has rarely been treated as such. Each era—ancient China, Rome, medieval Europe, Victorian England, or the modern West—produced its own version of the sex manual, a curious mix of morality and fantasy. These manuals reflected not knowledge but anxieties, taboos, and obsessions. For most of history, he shows, sex advice was less about love or pleasure and more about control—especially control of women’s bodies and male virtue.
Why We’ve Always Needed Sex Manuals
Naish begins with a simple question: why, when every other animal manages reproduction instinctively, do humans need instruction books? His answer is revealing. Because sex for humans isn’t only biological—it’s cultural, moral, and political. Whether it’s Confucian purity codes or Victorian prudery, societies have never stopped trying to manage the messy interplay between desire and respectability. He calls the writers of sex advice “sexperts,” a carnival of quacks, mystics, crusaders, scientists, doctors, and dreamers, each convinced they’ve found the secret formula for moral purity or erotic bliss.
These guides were rarely just practical manuals; they were guides to an ideal life. In one epoch, sex was sacred alchemy that could bestow immortality; in another, it was a sin leading to insanity or damnation. In modern times, Naish suggests, sex advice became a form of consumer entertainment—a way to sell reassurance to the insecure rather than insight to the curious.
From Ancient China to Modern Self-Help
The book begins with the earliest known sex texts—silk manuscripts buried in a 2nd-century BC Chinese tomb. These advocated mystical pleasure as a route to immortality. By exchanging energy between men and women—without ejaculation—a man could supposedly live forever. These early Taoist treatises mixed spiritual cosmology with anatomical error, warning that losing semen could shorten life. Naish links these beliefs to later Western notions that masturbation and frequent sex would sap vitality—showing how false biology has a long half-life.
The Greeks and Romans produced their own advice literature, but often cloaked in poetry. Ovid’s Ars Amatoria was both a seduction manual and a scandal that got the author exiled. The medieval Church took the opposite tack: St. Theodore’s Penitential listed punishments for every imaginable sexual act. Where the ancients saw pleasure as divine, the clerics saw temptation as the devil’s work. The Renaissance brought printing—and with it, erotic entrepreneurship. Illustrated manuals like I Modi (The Ways) made sexual positions an art form, while Nicholas Venette’s Mysteries of Conjugal Love Reveald (1703) dressed superstition in medical Latin.
Moral Panics and Medical Fantasies
Naish traces how, by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, sex advice blended religion with pseudoscience. Masturbation became the era’s great moral terror, thanks to pamphlets like Onania, which claimed self-pleasure led to blindness, insanity, and death. Evangelical reformers such as John Harvey Kellogg (inventor of cornflakes) and Sylvanus Stall went further, prescribing circumcision and carbolic acid to suppress “abnormal excitement.” Victorians like Dr. William Acton solemnly pronounced that most women “are not troubled by sexual feeling,” while reformers like Marie Stopes countered with the radical idea that women might actually enjoy sex.
As sex became medicalized, “proper” behavior was reframed as hygiene. Tracts like Theodoor Van de Velde’s Ideal Marriage (1928) or Eustace Chesser’s Love Without Fear tried to replace mysticism with clinical precision. But, Naish observes, they still moralized erotic pleasure—just with longer words and whiter coats. By the twentieth century, yearning was pathologized: frigid women, nymphomaniacs, and those with “exaggerated cravings” were labeled as sick rather than sinful.
The Age of Liberation and Saturation
Naish shows that by the mid-1900s, the pendulum swung again. Havelock Ellis’s psychological studies and Margaret Sanger’s crusades for contraception reframed desire as healthy. The 1960s sexual revolution turned old prohibitions into punchlines. Alex Comfort’s The Joy of Sex (1972) closed the loop begun with the ancient Chinese—transforming erotic instruction into a glossy, guilt-free celebration of mutual pleasure. But today’s deluge of manuals, videos, and tips, Naish argues, may have brought us full circle: we now risk replacing repression with performance anxiety. Where once celibacy was deviant, now “sexual inadequacy” is a modern sin.
Naish’s Underlying Message
Studying centuries of “bizarre advice” reveals less about what people did in bed than what they feared about themselves. Every manual, whether Taoist or television-era, is a mirror reflecting that culture’s contradictions—between desire and discipline, freedom and fear.
Naish closes by warning that even in the liberated 21st century, sex advice has become another form of control—dictating how we should feel, look, and perform. The difference is that the priests have been replaced by influencers. Understanding this history frees you to see that true sexual wisdom doesn’t come from experts or positions but from compassion, knowledge, and mutual respect—a truth as ancient as humanity itself.